Category: Hologramic Prose

  • scratch lawnmower

    scratch lawnmower


    More sonic experiments on a phonetic scratch tip, inspired by konnakol and beatbox and scratching. Catch up, check out the origins story of this technology: HERE “Deep Scratch Remix”

    deep da BEEp BEEP deep pa' deep scratch (shh, sh)
    
    deep dip it ta, da BEEp BEEP deep pa' deep scratch (shh, sh)

    deep da BEEp BEEP deep pa’ deep scratch (shh, sh) deep dip it ta, da BEEp BEEP deep pa’ deep scratch (shh, sh)

    deep da BEEp BEEP deep pa’ deep scratch (shh, sh) deep dip it ta, da BEEp BEEP deep pa’ deep scratch (shh, sh)

    Scrrrraaaattttcccchhhhhh, drop it

    [verse] Mouth scratchin, sucking beats down the hatchin’ Bwoy-yip, oi-ip, wuha haahe wuha haha phipha fipha haha, apa apa, oh arrrr. Oh, R I’m like a human lawnmower

    [verse] Buzz buzz BUzz, b, Buzz BUZZ, b, Buzz Buzz Buzz Buzz buzz, BUZZ, b, Buzz. Buzz buzz BUzz, b, Buzz BUZZ, b, Buzz Buzz Buzz Buzz buzz, BUZZ, b, Buzz.

    Buzz buzz BUzz, b, Buzz BUZZ, b, Buzz Buzz Buzz Buzz buzz, BUZZ, b, Buzz.

    vb hmm shk hmm vb hmm shk vb hmm shk hmm vb hmm shk vb hmm shk hmm vb hmm shk shwax, wax, wax on rotation, making up beats to rock rock the nation [end]

  • Enhance reverse obsolete flip

    Enhance reverse obsolete flip



    This DJ thinks that the language of turntables (here hallucinated from Udio data dust) hold keys to the DJ mosaic methodology: Hologrammic prose/jazz. A Part of the Deep Scratcher’s Code. Generative AI presents a new set of data points. #taleofthetribe #tribetablemethod #TetradOfMediaEffects #McLuhan

    Marshall McLuhan‘s tetrad of media effects uses a tetrad – a four-part construct – to examine the effects on society of any technology/medium (that is, a means of explaining the social processes underlying the adoption of a technology/medium) by dividing its effects into four categories and displaying them simultaneously.–TOME

  • Jung Pauli Field and RAW psych’ travel

    My paper given at the Star Ship conference has the basic equation for the timescape effect in the Jung-Pauli field. The Jung-Pauli field is the Seth Lloyd hologram computer software at our future de Sitter event horizon “boundary” of our observable universe whose area is the entropy of the interior hologram images that were and every material object are.–Jack Sarfatti, October, 2011.

    As information increases unpredictability increases, some information theorist said in 1989 at the world future society, I just learned from listening to RAW.

    I still listen to Robert Anton Wilson a lot, and for many reasons, one is that it feeds my own natural wonder in a way no other writer does, dead or alive. But, with such a mass of subjects covered by RAW in such a scientific and rational way where does one begin who wants to communicate the feeling of reading RAW? and/or information theory in general, which RAW approximates with his unique species of hologrammic prose. (one might propose influences on this hologrammic Prose as being Pound’s Ideogramic Method, Joyce’s nat language and linguistic relativistic fiction, Alfred Korzybski’s General Semantics, Schroedinger, Einstein and Bohmian equations, and mixed with Sufi stroke cabbalistic stroke Burroughsian styling)


    Needless to say RAW embodies the Hermetic principle, and the general Eastern philosophical leaning toward holism. Both in his writing technique and writing subject matter, and in his life philosophy and way of communicating RAW reflects the very general principle of holism, and so it’s no surprise he himself liked to call his particular writing style hologrammic prose.

    You can simply research all words beginning with the prefix HOL to get an idea of how far this general principle has entered 21st century culture. Holistic health and healing, holographic cosmology, holographic neurology, Holographic data storage remain strong 2012 memes floating around the web-sphere. A careful re-reading and focus upon the ‘holographic’ and ‘holistic’ themes and explicit mentioning in RAW’s work is a research programme I highly recommend and have been pursuing over the last 5 years.

    Over the last week (Feb 14-21) I have come to a new vision of how RAW’s interpretations of Quantum Mechanics and Cosmology, neurology and a special kind of writing (hologrammic prose) reflect some of the latest ideas in the more specific area of cosmological physics. In particular ‘holographic’ models of cosmology, in the tradition of David Bohm, Jack Sarfatti and yes, Giordano Bruno.

    Let me try to explain. And at least give you some mixed media links and source material for you to catch my drift.    

    “Now both men are dead. Physics has undergone great advances with its grand unified theories and its current development of superstring theory. Yet the central question remains: What is the nature of Pauli’s great dream? What is that speculum that lies between the worlds of mind and matter? Will it be possible to develop a new physics and a new psychology which are complementary to each other? This is not simply some intellectual problem or an idle inquiry; rather, it is vital to our very human survival.–F. David Peat.
    http://www.paricenter.com/library/papers/peat26.php

    The third part of a lecture given by Prof. Arthur I. Miller (University College London) on Thursday 10 December 2009 at CERN.

    Since Kepler believed in the famous dictum, “as above so below,” it was natural to assume that the solar system reflected an image of the Trinity and the human mind itself. Such ideas are certainly not far-fetched. David Bohm has told me how, while working on his theory of the plasma state, he felt that the whole plasma was a living thing, a society of electrons, as it were. Over the past decade, Bohm has been lecturing and thinking not only about physics but also about society, religion, and human consciousness. He explores these integrations on many levels without any sense of inner division. This approach would be familiar to Pauli, who pointed out how science and religion have a common origin which, alas, has been forgotten today.–http://www.paricenter.com/library/papers/peat26.php

    “The first four hundred were basis for his research into alchemical symbolism in a modern psyche. In a later collaboration, Pauli supported Jung’s synchronicity principle as scientific, and Jung fostered Pauli’s understanding of the archetypal and collective factors in the psyche. They each explored the interconnections between the energies of psyche and matter, and the possibilities of acausal order and synchronicity. Pauli’s ground-breaking discoveries gave scientific demonstration of alchemical intuitions. Through him, alchemical and archetypal insights entered the discourse of physics. Through Jung, the apprehensions of microphysics entered our psychological language and thought.–http://www.pep-web.org/document.php?id=joap.040.0531a

    “Jung and Pauli were convinced that synchronistic events reveal an underlying unity of mind and matter, subjective and objective realities. Synchronicity was (and continues to be) a prime target for criticism of Jung that for decades bordered on outright dismissal by many in the scientific and academic communities. For example, historian of science Suzanne Gieser writes that she finds Pauli’s interest in Jung “unusual” because “most of those with an academic or scientific background dismiss Jung totally.”5http://www.metanexus.net/essay/wolfgang-pauli-carl-jung-and-acausal-connecting-principle-case-study-transdisciplinarity



    http://www.scientificexploration.org/journal/jse_11_3_atmanspacher.pdf

  • Some Joyce/Pound ‘News’ items…

     

     

     

    The Politics of Modernist Poetics: Ezra Pound, Amy Lowell and Imagism:

    Imagism was the poetry of directness and distillation championed by Ezra Pound and Amy Lowell in the first years of the 20th century, reacting against the flowery verse of late Romanticism and urging poets to look to earlier models—like Sappho in ancient Greece and Li Po in 8th century China—to create a poetry of precise and powerful images, without any superfluous words or ornaments.

    http://poetry.about.com/b/2011/10/19/the-politics-of-modernist-poetics-ezra-pound-amy-lowell-and-imagism.htm

    Great literature will live on with or without a prize

    With readability the watchword for the Man Booker prize, it’s unlikely any of the literary greats would even get on to the shortlist
    • The Observer, Sunday 16 October 2011  
    • Would James Joyce have ever made the Man Booker shortlist? Not, you guess, if the current crop of judges had anything to do with it. A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man might have squeaked on, but Ulysses? Not a chance. “Readability” is the watchword of this year’s panel, apparently, led by the former spy mistress, Dame Stella Rimington. Fellow judge and ex-MP Chris Mullin likes something with a “bit of zip”.
      Given that the Booker is at heart a speed-reading contest for judges – 100-odd novels to read in a couple of months – it is not surprising that those poor unfortunates faced with the task favour books that can be tackled in a few swift hours. Eighty books in and counting, who would want to be confronted with Finnegans Wake?

      http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/oct/16/observer-editorial-man-booker-prize?newsfeed=true 

      “Poetic possibilities

      Review by MARTIN SPICE

      Poet/editor Ezra Pound’s contribution to what we now know as The Waste Land was profound and is well documented. Many years ago, British publishers Faber & Faber released a facsimile transcript showing his comments and crossings out and he is frequently referred to, rightly or wrongly, as the architect of the poem. Those amendments and alterations are included in the app and can be seen alongside the final version of the poem. There are hours of interest here in examining just what Pound left in and took out.

      http://thestar.com.my/lifestyle/story.asp?file=/2011/7/5/lifebookshelf/9009337&sec=lifebookshelf

      Mad about the girl: Tate Liverpool’s Alice in Wonderland show

      Alice Liddell inspired Lewis Carroll, whose books inspired a thousand art works. But are they any good? Adrian Searle heads down the rabbit hole at Tate Liverpool’s new show
    Alice Pleasance Liddell taken by Charles Dodgson aka Lewis Carroll 
    The real Alice … Alice Pleasance Liddell taken by Charles Dodgson aka Lewis Carroll. Photograph: National Portrait Gallery London
     

    Lewis Carroll, or rather the fictive world of Reverend Charles Lutwidge Dodgson, is firmly embedded in our culture. I am surprised no one has made a religion out of Alice. Perhaps they have.

    She is also very much at large in Tate Liverpool. Here she is, here she isn’t: in James Joyce’s Finnegans Wake and in Jorge Luis Borges; in Jefferson Airplane’s White Rabbit, and in the surrealist works of Max Ernst and Salvador Dalí. Alice captivated Virginia Woolf and Walt Disney, inspired Robert Smithson, Sigmar Polke and a host of better and worse visual artists. Characters from the Alice books, or rather their putative ancestors, can be found, according to Alberto Manguel (writing in a brilliant, short catalogue essay), in Hamlet and Don Quixote, in Kafka, Homer and the Bible. The influence of Carroll’s creation can be found in sci-fi, detective fiction and philosophy, in pre-Raphaelite painting and in hard-arsed conceptualism. You can’t shake Alice off.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/2011/nov/02/alice-wonderland-tate-liverpool-review?newsfeed=true

  • on reading Finnegans Wake

    From the Guardian….


    I’ve finally got round to Finnegans Wake. Here’s how you read Finnegans Wake: you get a good guide book. You don’t expect to read it like an ordinary novel any more than you would complain that Picasso’s Weeping Woman hasn’t got her face on right. You take it slow, keep a sense of fun and don’t care about not understanding everything. Read aloud. Listen to its rhythms because it’s music as well as prose. Linger over sentences that are like holograms. Find yourself mentally using Wake words such as “teetotalitarianism” and “chaosmos”. Like Shakespeare and the Bible, the Wake will begin to throw up the right words for everything. At last something exquisite and strange begins to happen. You feel you’ve wandered into the collective unconscious. Chiming themes emerge, running through all history and experience, and underneath it all, a family lives out a small tragicomic drama that is the same human drama that has been acted and re-enacted since time began.

    The Wake invokes death and the dying of the light with some of the most sublime poetry in the English language. It is almost unbelievable, a madly audacious and impossible work, and I can understand why some people hate it. But for me it’s like falling in love with reading all over again.

    Carol Birch will be appearing at the Edinburgh International Book Festival on Wednesday 24 August.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2011/jul/29/james-joyce-my-hero-carol-birch

  • RAW and PHYSICS CONSCIOUSNESS RESEARCH GROUP (RAW Illumination)


     
    Michael Johnson annotates the new book

    [If you missed it, Michael Johnson posted a long comment to Sunday’s blog post about How the Hippies Saved Physics, which is literally all about the offbeat physicists in the Bay Area who greatly influenced RAW’s thinking. Michael’s comment is a useful annotation to the must-read book of the summer, so I am reposting it here everyone will see it — Tom]

    The Physics-Consciousness Research Group. See:

    Illuminati Papers: 32 (diagram of “context-dependent language model of Nick Herbert); 56 ( Sarfatti on ETI contactees); pp.94-103

    Leary’s Info-Psychology: 33 (and 8th circuit); 49 (note Sarfatti in context); 129-131 (written by Nick Herbert)

    Cosmic Trigger 2: 257 (Back To The Future best artistic expression of quantum logic: Sarfatti model fro Chris Lloyd); 267-268

    Schrodinger’s Cat Trilogy: 242 & 314, 426-427 (Herbert’s QUIP); 274 (Capra’s Tao of Physics); 343-344 (Sarfatti); 345-346 (Sirag’s General Field Theory); 540-545

    Trajectories May 1982 and Fall 1984: Nick Herbert and Bell’s Theorem

    Gnosis, Winter 1988-89:(Sarfatti and Faster-Than-Light ideas FTL); Edwin Harris Walker

    Coincidance: 153-155 (Walker, Honegger, Sarfatti)

    Semiotext(E) SF: 70-72 (Nick Herbert’s wild particle physics story that includes RU Sirius)

    Omni, Dec, 1979, “UFO Update” (Sirag’s conjecture about time travellers)

    Prometheus Rising: acknowledgment page: Sirag, Sarfatti, Herbert, who “clarified (RAW’s) whole comprehension of epistemology;” 41 (and 8CB model); 183 (Barbara Honegger: cave paintings & 5th circuit yogic/shamanic brain: 30K yrs ago); 204 (Honegger’s theory of synchroncity); 267-269 (Bell’s Theorem and Sarfatti, et.al)

    Mavericks of the Mind: 67-88 (Nick Herbert); 124 (Honegger); 125 (Walker)

    Chaos and Beyond: 232-235 (review of Fred Alan Wolf’s Eagle’s Quest)

    Everything Is Under Control: 138 (Sarfatti)

    New Libertarian magazine Interview, 4/10-77: two pages on magick and quantum mechanics. Sarfatti as the head of the PCRG. RAW recommends Space-Time and Beyond, by Bob Toben, but Sarfatti says the ideas are his?

    for another view of Sarfatti, see him as a North Beach denizen (San Francisco) in Herbert Gold’s book on Behemia

    Email To The Universe: 41 (Capra and Herbert); 244 (group mentioned); 223 (Mishlove might have been PCRG)

    Michael Hollingshead interview (High Times?): RAW says he’s the PCRG’s “chief literary spokesman;” RAW talks about physicists who’ve used LSD

    Wilhelm Reich In Hell: 33 (Capra and “fundamental holism”)

    see Sarfatti in Imaginary Weapons, pp.11-14

    see Kripal’s book on Esalen: 291-314 (Capra, Stapp, Sarfatti, F.A. Wolf, Nick Hergbert, Gary Zukav)

    New Libertarian mag, RAW interview, 9/5/76: RAW recommends recent issue of Spit In The Ocean, for Sirag and Sarfatti on quantum consciousness Sarfatti as a “skeptical contactee”

    Eight Circuit Brain by Antero Alli: 293-294 (mentions Saraffti and Sirag at RAW’s salons in Berkeley hills, 1979)

    I could list more if anyone’s innarested.

    Were they related to the SRI group with Targ and Puhoff: Scientologists? Who funded them? What role might Werner Erhard have played? How close was Ira Einhorn to the group?

    How influential was Stapp? How did Barbara Honegger make it into the Reagan Administration? She wrote the first book titled October Surprise.

    RAW had mentioned a few times that he sometimes played with the idea that he had been a “useful idiot” to the CIA or some other group.

    http://www.rawillumination.net/

  • "Hubbleforth slouch" Finnegans Wake and Hubble’s constant

    Google are celbrating the 20th anniversary of the HUBBLE TELESCOPE today. By decorating the google home page with a cosmological landscape. I recently tuned into Hubble and Finnegans wake, and turned up the word Hubbleforth, that I wanted to share on this 20th anniversary.

    Furthermore, Hubble’s constant plays a part in experimental physics, and experimental theories of consciousness, or ‘cosmic consciousness’ the distance and velocity of galaxies can be calculated using Hubble’s constant, or Hubble’s RedShift. Some have tied in the ratio of the expanding Universe with the critical amount of single electron cubits lying at the [bit bottom] of human neurological processing. Hence, in my short and clunky definition, we have a theory of consciousness, rationalized using cosmological principles. Close to the hermetic principle ‘as of above, so below’. But with scientific and mathematical principles describing such a relationship. My introduction to this idea was through the maverick experimental physicist, Jack Sarfatti, detailed in the books of Dr. Robert Anton Wilson.

    I wanted to share what I perceive to be the general trends (2010) within modern experimental physics, cosmology and psychology (neurology) that include the HOLOGRAPHIC principle. And have blogged about James Joyce’s Finnegans Wake, and its relationship to the Holographic Principle as defined by ‘Susskind and Hooft’. I am still working on a piece about Dr. Wilson, and his ‘holographic prose’ defined and deployed throughout 36 books, and countless articles over a 50 year period of earth history (1932-2007). Together, I propose that Dr. Wilson, like James Joyce, is at the Vanguard of communicating the ‘holographic principles’.

    I propose that ‘if’ the holographic principle, or a new updated version of this theory is found to be a snug fit, a unified theory and general theory of everything, then… James Joyce and Dr. Robert Anton Wilson will seem like ‘GODS’ who worked out the earth language for describing such a Holographic Theory of Everything, and did this somewhat ‘outside’ of the traditional institutions and Universities associated with such ‘revolution’s’ and/or ‘paradigm shitfs’.

    I think it was R.U Sirius who said that when the going gets weird, the weird turn professional’, and cutting edge science and technology and culture is getting weirder and weirder. I think, and next to surrealism and the Artists science of the weird, Dr. Robert Anton Wilson stands as a ‘standard’ of thinking and working creativly with the ‘weird’

    Why are hardly any of the major learning institutions teaching ‘Robert Anton Wilson’ and ‘Holographic Prose?, when cutting edge experimental physics seems to be suggesting that the Holographic model is very important and relative to 2010 science, technology and culture? Maybe uncle BOB made the fatal mistake of connecting Economics and Politics to his holographic theory, and thereby jumping so far forward that we suffer culture-shock, when we follow the trajectories he maps, using the Holographic Principle, via James Joyce, David Bohm, Stan Grof, Giordano Bruno, Jack Sarfatti, John Archibald Wheeler, Einstein and Timothy Leary.

    I look forward to any academic response to this proposition that uncle BOB had it back in the 1970’s, and had already plotted how hyperbolic geometry and the ‘holographic principle’ might impact on humanity, our perceptions and collective futures. Dr. Robert Anton Wilson was largely ignored by Academic establishments, possibly due to his cutting criticism of the ‘institution’ and ‘state-run-education’ but still today, after his passing, it seems hardly any academic are presenting Dr. Wilson, and his ideas and principles as worthy sources and resources.

    I am fortuate to be a part of the Maybelogic Academy that aims to do all of the above, and provide a forum and hub for RAW related studies. I do feel frustrated at the lack of other learning centres adopting our model, which was set up alongside Dr. Wilson himself in 2004, which I think helps define our advantages as a HUB, we have a single human being who reflects a comprehensive study, a single narrator, a single artist, telling us the tale of the tribe.

    My schemes into obeyance for This
    time has had to fall: they bit goodbyte to their thumb and, his
    bandol eer his solgier, dripdropdrap on pool or poldier, wishing
    the loff a falladelfian in the morning, proceeded with a
    Hubbleforth slouch in his slips backwords (Et Cur Heli!) in the directions
    of the duff and demb institutions about ten or eleven hundred
    years lurch away in the moonshiny gorge of Patself on the Bach. —James Joyce, Finnegans Wake: Page 73.

    21.00 Alice and Bob. Leonard Suuskind on Cosmology at Stanford, 2009.

    The Illuminati Papers
    By Robert Anton Wilson

    http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=v040Hpa7xnoC&lpg=PA31&dq=coex&pg=PA31&output=embed

    An introduction to black holes, information and the string theory revolution …
    By Leonard Susskind, James Lindesay
    http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=cxJCBRUNmVYC&lpg=PA127&dq=holographic%20principle&lr&pg=PA127&output=embed

    Developments in Mathematical and Experimental Physics: Cosmology and gravitation
    By Alfredo Macías, Francisco J. Uribe, Enrique Diaz

    http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=3ZURuKaxdy8C&lpg=PA57&dq=holographic%20principle&lr&pg=PA57&output=embed

    Psychology of the future: lessons from modern consciousness research
    By Stanislav Grof
    http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=RwQnJ1p7qWUC&lpg=PA23&dq=coex&pg=PA23&output=embed

  • RAW V.A.L.I.S JOYCE & HOLO-GRAMIC PROSE?

    “One great part of every human existence is passed in a state which cannot be rendered sensible by the use of wideawake language, cutanddry grammar and goahead plot. –JAMES JOYCE, Referring to Finnegans Wake in a letter to Harriet Shaw Weaver (1926-11-24)”

    I have a playman’s or better yet ploughman’s interest in physics, science and the paranormal, once again due for the most part to Dr. Robert Anton Wilson.

    I was fortunate to meet many of the bright characters from the Berkeley Based Physics Consciousness Research Institute, where RAW was a somewhat regular alumni, with an irregular illumi.

    Fly On The Tale Of The Tribe: A Rollercoaster Ride With Robert Anton Wilson

    by Steven James Pratt

    Link: http://a.co/gOGNKyV

    (more…)

  • IE is for Interview by Email: They shall come to know Go(o)d

    Every yin needs a yang. Every Hodge
    needs a Podge. We should be united.–Illuminatus Trilogy! Page 423!

    Fly: Could you explain a little bit about your holographic prose?

    RAW: No. I’m struggling to write a whole book about
    that right now and can’t imagine how to
    condense it. Besides, it’s the hardest
    part of my work to translate…
    I’ll give you two related samples from the Illuminatus and see what you
    can make of them: “They shall come to gno gods.”
    “They shall come to gnu godz.”

    email from–Tue, 8 Jan 2002, 11:10:54-0800.

    I have slept on this small riddle Bob spun for me, or i shd/ say i have not communicated my thoughts very much, and in retrospect i think it helps us in our continued investigative and independently minded research into RAW and his communications. So here i will expand a little on my research into these related samples.

    “SIMON MAGUS. You will come to know gods.”–Illuminatus Trilogy, Page 183.

    And then a little further down the page we find:

    “The note said:
    “Machen’s dols = Lovecraft’s dholes?”

    VECTORS. You will come to no gods.”

    Near the end of the bugguiness of Finnegans Wake (page 615) we find the line

    “Mucksrats which bring up about uhrweckers they will come to
    know good.”

    I suspect Bob might of sailed across this line on one or two of his many readings of Finnegans Wake. And he put it into I.T! ?

    While researching this small puzzle that Bob left for me to unravel, i discovered something else that grabbed me like T-Rex or King Kong, out of my seat. Typical of RAW in many ways, or typical of the ever expanding infinite-flux of being? On Page 183 of Illuminatus, the page on which we find Simon Magus saying: You will come to know gods, also features a dialogue about Amanita Muscaria (fly agaric) in the context of the investigation of Professor J. N. Marsh, who appears to have gone missing, in the novel?

    Maybe Bob was actually answering the question directly without being consciously aware that his example from Illuminatus! was right next to a passage describing fly agaric intoxication and some of its background history. (Amanita Muscaria appears as the 24th entry of the INDEX to Cosmic Trigger, and this is where i first came across it in the context of RAW. I had however read a little of Terence Mckenna around about the same time who also writes of Amanita in his book “Food of the Goods”. But the point here is that i was still unaware of Amanita and its use and ab-use within Illuminatus Trilogy! (!). Up until re-reading the book in the class Illuminatus! with Bob himself.)

    As this communication with Bob was facilitated by email, he might have noticed fly agaric@hotmail.com, my email address, and then so maybe he did choose the line from Simon Magus especially for fly, as an answer to my question about Hologramic Prose?

    With a fully searchable PDF version of Illuminatus Trilogy! you can find thousands of Joycean like–coincidances of contraries–but often on a different level of magnification to Joyce’s Finnegans Wake and its maximal condensation. Hodge-Podge seems to have Viconian, Joycean, Zen-Koan like qualities tied-up-with-it.

    During lunch (which always ended with golden apfel-strudel), Galley and Eichmann danced for her,
    a complex ballet which Hagbard called “Hodge-Podge”; as many times as she saw this, she never
    was able to determine how they changed costumes at the climax, in which Hodge became Podge and
    Podge became Hodge. –Page 412.

    And just like the DANCE of Hodge-Podge described, the Illuminatus Trilogy itself comes to a climax with the Appendix and its greater explanation and exploration of Hagbard’s Hodge-Podge principle in a more Geo-political, Historical, cybernetic language.

    In this chaotic period, the Hodge and the Podge are in dynamic balance. There is no stasis: The
    balance is always shifting and homeostatic, in the manner of the ideal “self-organizing system” of
    General Systems Theory or Cybernetics. The Illuminati, and all authoritarian types in general, dislike
    such ages so much that they try to prevent any records of their existence from reaching the general
    public. Pre-Chou China was one such period, and its history (except for some fragments in Taoist
    lore) is largely lost; we do know, however, that the I Ching was reorganized when the Chou Dynasty
    introduced patriarchal authoritarianism to China. –434.

    I find a new beauty in the fact that Illuminatus Trilogy! combines these literary principles, in action (Captured by Theartre) and also with a CODEX, or appendix that begins to divulge the methods by which the author created the “Action” of the novel itself, and also being bound into the novel itself in a self-referncing or “hologramic Prose” technique; unique to Uncle Bob and his magikal communications.

    I have started a piece called the Unkle Bob principle”which uses a term i read by Hugh Kenner in his book Joyce’s Voices to describe James Joyce’s technique of using a general principle, that i understand to mean: The voice of the narrator need NOT always be the narrator him or her-self. Kenner’s Uncle Charles Principle honors the character called uncle Charles who sits in his outhouse reading and doing his bog business, and maybe also narrating parts of Ulysses?

    Anyhow, i’ll be putting these bits of research together and then applying them to I.T! Plus adding some source’s and sauces.

    –DJ Fly Agaric 23
    MPHDJ